A Fine Line

Published: Oct 01 , 2015
Author: John McMillan


A story in
the British press reads that oilfield services provider Halliburton has made an offer to swallow rival Baker Hughes for $35 billion; Schlumberger has weighed in on equipment maker Cameron International in a $14.8 billion deal.  Companies that specialise in one part of the services market, for example offshore drilling, are in a difficult situation and are finding themselves squeezed by their customers to such an extent that, in order to survive, they are having to accept takeover deals from bigger rivals or risk going out of business; takeover deals that would not have been countenanced 18 months ago are suddenly now acceptable – even welcome! 

In such a cut-throat environment, the service providers find themselves giving heavy discounts for the few deals that they can secure because customers find themselves with the upper hand at the negotiating table.

North Sea oil producer Enquest, which hires services firms for projects on a regular basis, said it had negotiated discounts of up to 50 percent on some contracts.  The industry consensus on new rates is around 20 percent below previous years.  Enquest chief executive Amjad Bseisu told Reuters, "We give our contractors all notice that we're going to fire them.  We sit with them and say, 'do you want to negotiate or do you want to bid things out?'"

Because of their weak bargaining position, the services companies also have to take on a higher share of project risks that oil producers are increasingly unwilling to shoulder themselves.

"We are able to be selective and, in different circumstances to transfer a bit of risk to the service side," said Tony Durrant, chief executive of North Sea oil producer, Premier Oil. Rig providers, for example, now charge lower rates for days when their equipment is not used due to poor weather, something that was countenanced a year ago when the risk always lay with the client.

"When rigs are very short they are quite happy to use their negotiating power. It's a balance," said Durrant.

All of which goes to demonstrate how the power balance shifts depending on cyclical shifts in the market.  Negotiators need to be flexible and to recognise when they have the upper hand (less need for flexibility) or the opposite (more need for flexibility).  When the power balance is against you, you need to be very careful not to set unfortunate precedents, but when it is with you, you need to give the other side some room to breathe, so that when their good times come back and the balance shifts back again, they do not want to punish you!

A fine line indeed!

John McMillan


SHARE

John McMillan.jpg

About the author:

John McMillan
After graduation I worked as an industrial sales engineer. This job involved both management/union negotiating and negotiating large commercial contracts. Inspired by a study of union negotiating, and using my own personal experience, I created what was to be the UK’s first course teaching the skills of negotiation, as opposed to the theory.

Read more about John McMillan

More posts by John McMillan

Latest Blog:

Who is Going to Pick the Fruit?

It’s amazing how many people go into negotiations with no clear idea about their bottom line. “We’ll see how it goes,” seems to be the rather naïve thought and of course they leave themselves open to the risk of a really poor and unprofitable deal at the end of it. It is empowering to know your bottom line, especially when you have internal agreement at senior level. Think about it: the other side are aggressively demanding that you improve your terms, but you know that what they are asking for is beyond your bottom line.

Latest Tweet:

Scotwork UK Limited
7 Fortrose St
Glasgow
G11 5NU
United Kingdom
+44 (0) 1413573989
info@scotwork.com
Follow us
Scotwork 21092 - Training Course.png
voty2016_sign_gold.png